Sunday, 6 January 2013

‘Downton Abbey’ Season 3: What Early Reviews Are Saying (WALL STREET JOURNAL) (WARNING, THERE ARE SPOILERS IN SOME OF THE LINKS)

By Barbara Chai


Read some early reviews of the show’s third season, which has already concluded in the U.K. Warning: some reviews contain spoilers.


“Let’s talk Shirley MacLaine, because it’s not every day or night you come across a pair of Oscar-winning actresses — [Maggie] Smith is actually a two-time winner — sharing the small screen, even when that screen frames one of TV’s most celebrated series.” [Verne Gay, Newsday]

“Season 3 of Downton is a return to form for the show, recapturing the dazzling wit and sweeping romance of the now-classic first season.” [Jace Lacob, Daily Beast]

“Though Season 3 of “Downton” is somewhat stronger than Season 2 — which made “90210″ look like a model of narrative coherence by comparison — there are still times I mutter darkly about the drama, I must admit.” [Maureen Ryan, Huffington Post]

“The good news is that most of the crazy plot twists and soapier elements have vanished. Fellowes has a stronger hold on telling the individual tales of his well-drawn characters, and that pinpoint focus utterly redeems the series early on. That’s not to say things won’t get a little sudsy as the season unwinds, but Downton is nearly as ship-shape as it was in season one and seems as confident and as winning as it did then.” [Tim Goodman, Hollywood Reporter]

“As sweet as treacle tart, the third season of Downton Abbey arrives reasonably fresh and warm. The Downton property — that gigantic pile of stones — may be chilly, but the upper-floor twits and the lower-floor underclass can still be counted on to provide a lot of good fun.” [Ken Tucker, Entertainment Weekly]

READ MORE: http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2013/01/03/downton-abbey-season-3-what-early-reviews-are-saying/

No comments:

Post a Comment